MoorcroftsMoorcrofts
Menu
  • Services
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Contact

Dress Codes – These Boots Are Made For Walking!

These Boots are made for walking - dress code

Dress Codes – These Boots Are Made For Walking!

19th July 2018

Share this post

The Government’s Equalities Office has just published new guidance on dress codes and sex discrimination.

At only nine pages long, it won’t take you long to read it and it has already been branded a “Janet and John” guide in some HR circles. Whilst I would agree that it is a little light. It is nonetheless a useful starting point for an employer who has a dress code or is thinking about putting one in place.

It makes the point that a dress code can be a legitimate part of an employer’s terms and conditions of employment. It also makes the point that dress polices for men and women don’t have to be identical, but standards imposed should be equivalent. This is underlined by the example in the guide itself which confirms that a requirement for men to wear a shirt and tie is not unlawful if women are also expected to wear smart office attire.

The guide also comments in some detail on employers who require women to wear high heels. This may well be on the back of the case in December 2015 when PWC sent home a receptionist for not wearing high heels and the subsequent pressure on the Government to make dress codes which required the wearing of high heels unlawful. It was always unlikely that the Government would introduce legislation on this topic. However, the guide makes it very clear that it is best to avoid gender specific prescriptive requirements such as the requirement to wear high heels. A dress code which imposes a requirement on female staff to wear high heels but doesn’t place any footwear requirements on male employees or merely requires them to look smart is likely to constitute direct discrimination on the grounds of sex.

It would also appear that the Government has reacted to the recent Presidents Club debacle and the requirement that the hostesses attending the event had to wear a particular type of dress. Interestingly, the guide makes the point so long as you require both male and female employees to dress in a provocative manner, that would probably not amount to direct discrimination. However, it could well lead to an environment in which employees may be vulnerable to unwanted sexual attention and harassment and lead to claims as a result.

The other sensible point the guide makes is that it is important that a dress code does not discriminate against employees with a particular religion or belief or no religion or belief.

In short, whilst dress codes are permissible and lawful, employers need to think carefully about them.

For employment law advice in respect of dress codes and sex discrimination, please contact Matt Jenkin on t: 01628 470 011 or e: matt.jenkin@moorcrofts.com.

Related Post

7TH JANUARY 2019

Moorcrofts LLP advises Riwal UK Limited as it prepares to...

Leading Thames Valley Law Firm, Moorcrofts’ commercial property team are advising Riwal UK Limited (Riwal UK) as it prepares to open a major new depot for London and the M1 corridor. Riwal UK is part of Riwal Holding Group, based...

18TH DECEMBER 2018

The Governments Good Work Plan impacts all employers

The Government published its “Good Work Plan” on 17 December 2018 which, given that the Government claims that this plan sets out the biggest package of workplace reforms for over 20 years, has resulted in lots of publicity....

Leave a Comments Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • Moorcrofts LLP advises on sale of a controlling interest in Levelise Limited

    20th February 2019
  • OpenSym 2019 announce Andrew Katz as a keynote speaker

    19th February 2019
  • Andrew Katz to speak at FOSDEM | 2 February 2019

    31st January 2019

Get in touch

team@moorcrofts.com
T. +44 (0) 1628 470000
F. +44 (0) 1628 470001

Find us

Thames House
Mere Park
Dedmere Road
Marlow
Bucks
SL7 1PB
Moorcrofts LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC311818. Partners: Andrew Katz, Adrian Phillips, Theresa Hunter, Matthew Jenkin, Peter Woolley and William Pearce. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 419658) VAT no. GB 727298404

"Partner" means a member of moorcrofts LLP or a person of equivalent status, qualification and experience

Privacy and cookies  |  Complaints

© 2018 Moorcrofts LLP, All Rights Reserved.