MoorcroftsMoorcroftsMoorcroftsMoorcrofts
Menu
  • Services
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Contact

Justifying the Gender Pay Gap and Equal Pay

Justifying the Gender Pay Gap and Equal Pay

10th January 2018

Share this post

Equal pay and the gender pay gap have been hitting the headlines recently with the high-profile resignation of the BBC’s Carrie Gracie over unequal pay and the increasing number of organisations publishing details of their gender pay gap ahead of April’s deadline.

While the figures published to date are showing a clear disparity in pay between the sexes, it is interesting to see the efforts that are now being taken by organisations to analyse and explain the reasons behind their particular pay gap and the proposals that are being put forward to tackle it.

What is the gender pay gap reporting requirement?

Private and public sector organisations with 250 or more relevant employees are required to publish details of their gender pay gap by 4 April 2018 (see the Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017 (the “Regulations”)). This must include:

  • the overall pay gap calculated on the mean and median average hourly pay;
  • a separate pay gap calculation based on mean and median bonus pay with details of the proportion of male and female employees who received a bonus; and
  • a breakdown of the employer’s pay range into four quartiles with details of the gender split within each band.

Justifying the gender pay gap

While reports of double figure median pay gaps (for example 38.4% (Virgin Money) and 54.5% (Phase Eight)) clearly show the imbalance in pay between the sexes, many organisations who have published so far are stressing that a high gender pay gap does not mean unequal pay for equal work. It is true that the headline figures alone do not give the full picture and a more detailed analysis of the figures is required to establish the reasons behind the pay gap in any particular organisation.

While not a requirement of the Regulations, many organisations are providing a voluntary narrative to explain the reasons behind their particular pay gap to demonstrate the complex set of factors that have led to it. Justifications put forward include the proportionately lower levels of women in senior leadership roles, fewer women employed in highly paid STEM roles and a predominance of women in lower paid roles within an organisation (known as occupational segregation).

Some organisations are going further than the Regulations require in the breakdown provided, by showing the pay gap between particular categories or grade of staff. This exercise is helpful to identify areas where there may be a practice of unequal pay for equal work (and conversely to demonstrate that an employer does not have an unequal pay practice), which is not identified by either the headline pay gap figure or the breakdown into pay quartiles of male and female workers. This level of disclosure is voluntary however and without this level of transparency, it is possible for unequal pay to remain hidden within the overall pay gap figures.

Another gap in the reporting requirements is the requirement to differentiate between employees of different ages. The UK gender pay gap figures for April 2017 (see www.ons.gov.uk) show a stark increase in the gender pay gap for women in their 40s, which it states is likely to be connected to patterns of return to work after having children. A similar analysis of the gender pay gap across age groups within an organisation would show if women were indeed suffering a “motherhood” or “carer” penalty within that organisation and point to a need to address flexible working, pay and progression for part-time workers within that organisation.

While the gender pay gap reporting requirements are still at a very early stage, it is already evident that many organisations are beginning to analyse the cause of their pay gap and are taking steps to address this. However, the scale of change required appears to be significant and structural. Whether such pay gaps will in practice be reduced to zero remains to be seen.

We will also need to see what the impact will be on employers with less than 250 employees. Whilst they may not be required to report pay gap information, the issue of gender pay is likely to be a hot topic for some time to come. As such, even employers who are not required to report will be well advised to at least review current pay arrangements to ensure there is equal pay for equal work for both sexes across the organisation.

If you require any further information regarding the gender pay gap reporting requirements, please contact either Nicola Whelan at Nicola.whelan@moorcrofts.com or Matt Jenkin at Matt.jenkin@moorcrofts.com.

Related Post

2ND FEBRUARY 2023

Menopause in the Workplace – Employers left to fend for...

5TH OCTOBER 2022

Moorcrofts charity ‘Night at the Races’ raises over...

Recent Posts

  • Spreading cheer and goodwill: Moorcrofts supports Marlow Santa Fun Run!

    28th November 2023
  • Moorcrofts’ charity quiz triumphs, raising over £1000 for Thames Valley Adventure Playground

    27th November 2023
  • Andrew Katz receives prestigious Law and Policy Award at OpenUK Awards 2023

    21st November 2023

Get in touch

team@moorcrofts.com
T. +44 (0) 1628 470000
F. +44 (0) 1628 470001
LinkedIn Twitter

Find us

Thames House
Mere Park
Dedmere Road
Marlow
Bucks
SL7 1PB
The Legal 500 – The Clients Guide to Law Firms Firm Logo
Moorcrofts LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC311818. Partners: Andrew Katz, Theresa Hunter, Julia Ferguson, Kate Prentis, Matthew Jenkin, Peter Woolley, Tim Astley and William Pearce. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 419658) VAT no. GB 727298404

"Partner" means a member of Moorcrofts LLP or a person of equivalent status, qualification and experience

Privacy and cookies  | Service and price transparency  | Complaints

© 2023 Moorcrofts LLP, All Rights Reserved.